Sunday, December 15, 2013
What are the top 5 things that you have learned in life so far?
These are mine
1) Understand the concept of standards. If you are considered good/bad at something, always remember 'according to these standards'. Success, talent, beauty, intelligence, concept of strength - nothing holds the same standard across cultures or time. There is no point in feeling superior or inferior to anyone.
2) Never waste the power of words on white lies, mocking people or making promises that you don't mean to keep.
3) Be an open book. If you have to hide something, you shouldn't be doing that in the first place. Keep it a secret if it's not your story to tell, it is a burden for others to know yours or if their life experiences could confuse and end up bringing in unnecessary negativity. You don't owe the world justifications.
4) Never resort to revenge. Let God be the judge. If that person deserves mercy, you would have erred by resorting to revenge. If that person deserves discipline, you are not the right one to discharge that.
5) Learn where to use anger. Don't get angry at incompetent people. There is a difference between incompetence and indifference. It's not someone's fault if their intelligence doesn't fit the prevailing standards. Anger is best directed at hypocrites and bigots.
6) Practice gratitude. It's easy to thank God when things go our way. We manifest power when we get to that place where we can thank God after the worst of times. It releases us from the state of ego and plants us on the path of the soul. We will see the past, present, and the future condensed in the 'now' and it is beautiful!
Sunday, December 08, 2013
Anne Askew - The feminist protestant who was executed by another protestant (Religion kills?)
Thinking of Anne Askew this Sunday. She never got her due in Church history. She was a protestant executed by the protestant King Henry VIII (who separated the Church of England from papal authority) because he found her ideas 'too protestant'. He executed both Catholics and protestants alike. (Bloody Mary executed less than 300. Henry VIII killed around 17000 Catholics+Protestants for religion)
Anglican churches tend to tone down that history when they talk about their origins. She is also not the kind of role model that they can be proud of because this was a woman who refused to take her husband's surname in the 16th century and asked for a divorce because she found him ideologically incompatible. She also preached openly at a time a woman on pulpit was unthinkable. Apparently, the author who compiled her autobiography edited a lot of portions to conceal her aggression.
She refused to recant and was the only woman to be tortured before execution though the law was against torturing women. The torture in a rack broke her limbs and she had to be carried to the stake to be burnt. Her life would have been spared if she had said that she accepted the theory of transubstantiation. She was asked again on the stake if she wanted to recant and she refused.
She believed that the Lord's Supper is not literally the body and blood of Christ, but rather a sacred symbol of it. She said "But as touching the holy and blessed supper of the Lord, I believe it to be a most necessary remembrance of his glorious sufferings and death. Moreover, I believe as much therein as my eternal and only Redeemer, Jesus Christ, would [that] I should believe. Finally, I believe all those scriptures to be true [which] he has confirmed with his precious blood." She was executed for that. It wan't a case of having to deny God. She believed in something and she died because she didn't want to lie. She was only 26. Apparently, even John Foxe, who was against women leaders admired her courage.
What's interesting to me is how much 'words' meant to these people. Honestly, I have never worried about the technicalities of the Lord's supper. Whenever I partake, I know that it is symbolic and no scientific transformation actually takes place. Is it his body-yes as a symbol. Will this bread grow moldy if it is left somewhere- yes for that too. I guess that's what separates us from the Heroes.
This is a ballad written by her.
Like as the armed knight
Appointed to the field,
With this world will I fight
And Faith shall be my shield.
Faith is that weapon strong
Which will not fail at need.
My foes, therefore, among
Therewith will I proceed.
As it is had in strength
And force of Christ's way
It will prevail at length
Though all the devils say nay.
Faith in the fathers old
Obtained righteousness
Which make me very bold
To fear no world's distress.
I now rejoice in heart
And Hope bid me do so
For Christ will take my part
And ease me of my woe.
Thou saist, lord, who so knock,
To them wilt thou attend.
Undo, therefore, the lock
And thy strong power send.
More enemies now I have
Than hairs upon my head.
But fight thou in my stead.
On thee my care I cast.
For all their cruel spite
I set not by their haste
For thou art my delight.
I am not she that list
My anchor to let fall
For every drizzling mist
My ship substantial.
Not oft use I to wright
In prose nor yet in rime,
Yet will I shew one sight
That I saw in my time.
I saw a rial throne
Where Justice should have sit
But in her stead was one
Of moody cruel wit.
Absorpt was righteousness
As of the raging flood
Sathan in his excess
Suct up the guiltless blood.
Then thought I, Jesus lord,
When thou shalt judge us all
Hard is it to record
On these men what will fall.
Yet lord, I thee desire
For that they do to me
Let them not taste the hire
Of their iniquity.
Anglican churches tend to tone down that history when they talk about their origins. She is also not the kind of role model that they can be proud of because this was a woman who refused to take her husband's surname in the 16th century and asked for a divorce because she found him ideologically incompatible. She also preached openly at a time a woman on pulpit was unthinkable. Apparently, the author who compiled her autobiography edited a lot of portions to conceal her aggression.
She refused to recant and was the only woman to be tortured before execution though the law was against torturing women. The torture in a rack broke her limbs and she had to be carried to the stake to be burnt. Her life would have been spared if she had said that she accepted the theory of transubstantiation. She was asked again on the stake if she wanted to recant and she refused.
She believed that the Lord's Supper is not literally the body and blood of Christ, but rather a sacred symbol of it. She said "But as touching the holy and blessed supper of the Lord, I believe it to be a most necessary remembrance of his glorious sufferings and death. Moreover, I believe as much therein as my eternal and only Redeemer, Jesus Christ, would [that] I should believe. Finally, I believe all those scriptures to be true [which] he has confirmed with his precious blood." She was executed for that. It wan't a case of having to deny God. She believed in something and she died because she didn't want to lie. She was only 26. Apparently, even John Foxe, who was against women leaders admired her courage.
What's interesting to me is how much 'words' meant to these people. Honestly, I have never worried about the technicalities of the Lord's supper. Whenever I partake, I know that it is symbolic and no scientific transformation actually takes place. Is it his body-yes as a symbol. Will this bread grow moldy if it is left somewhere- yes for that too. I guess that's what separates us from the Heroes.
This is a ballad written by her.
Like as the armed knight
Appointed to the field,
With this world will I fight
And Faith shall be my shield.
Faith is that weapon strong
Which will not fail at need.
My foes, therefore, among
Therewith will I proceed.
As it is had in strength
And force of Christ's way
It will prevail at length
Though all the devils say nay.
Faith in the fathers old
Obtained righteousness
Which make me very bold
To fear no world's distress.
I now rejoice in heart
And Hope bid me do so
For Christ will take my part
And ease me of my woe.
Thou saist, lord, who so knock,
To them wilt thou attend.
Undo, therefore, the lock
And thy strong power send.
More enemies now I have
Than hairs upon my head.
But fight thou in my stead.
On thee my care I cast.
For all their cruel spite
I set not by their haste
For thou art my delight.
I am not she that list
My anchor to let fall
For every drizzling mist
My ship substantial.
Not oft use I to wright
In prose nor yet in rime,
Yet will I shew one sight
That I saw in my time.
I saw a rial throne
Where Justice should have sit
But in her stead was one
Of moody cruel wit.
Absorpt was righteousness
As of the raging flood
Sathan in his excess
Suct up the guiltless blood.
Then thought I, Jesus lord,
When thou shalt judge us all
Hard is it to record
On these men what will fall.
Yet lord, I thee desire
For that they do to me
Let them not taste the hire
Of their iniquity.
Thursday, April 18, 2013
Why do I support gay marriages?
I thought of posting why I support gay marriages and better still why I feel the need to talk about it. Sanju subscribes to the Christian church’s ideology though
I wanted to list down the 'Christian' reasons here since this has become a major theological teaching. This reasoning
is based on the golden rule and how I perceive Jesus Christ. I wrote about this in a previous post here
When slavery was abolished, many Christians were against it because they didn’t consider the revolt Christian. Some even argued that equality was against the nature of humans. I am glad most Christians agree today that the golden rule just doesn’t give any provision for slavery. Did Jesus talk about slavery in general? No. Did he even preach to the gentiles? No. But he did give the golden rule on which Christian ideologies should hinge on. He never spoke against homosexuals. Preachers won't step down from the pulpits on those grounds but are eager to condemn homosexuals to hell.
When slavery was abolished, many Christians were against it because they didn’t consider the revolt Christian. Some even argued that equality was against the nature of humans. I am glad most Christians agree today that the golden rule just doesn’t give any provision for slavery. Did Jesus talk about slavery in general? No. Did he even preach to the gentiles? No. But he did give the golden rule on which Christian ideologies should hinge on. He never spoke against homosexuals. Preachers won't step down from the pulpits on those grounds but are eager to condemn homosexuals to hell.
I see an evolution in terms of understanding of God when I
read the Bible from the Old Testament to the New Testament. I don’t believe that God gave the commandment
to take in multiple wives, annihilate enemies or take in
virgin plunders. The human understanding of God evolved. He broke superstitious rules that were once meant to be holy. That’s why it’s dangerous to quote verses that are the
opinions of people with limited revelations.
If I stand for commitment, I should encourage commitment. If
someone is born with a different sexual orientation and desires commitment, I
don’t have any logical reason against it. Why should we drive homosexuals out
of churches, refuse legal commitments and then point fingers at an immoral life
style. It’s up to a church to decide whether or not they want to conduct a
homosexual marriage. But lobbying
against legal equality is unreasonable. Should someone be punished for the way
they are born just so that we could feel righteous?
I talk about this openly whenever I get a chance because however
inconsequential it is, that is one more voice added from the Christian crowd. I am glad there were people who were not
afraid to voice out against slavery, racism at a point such inequality was considered a safe
Christian ideology. If they had inferred that any social cause is inconsequential
since Jesus Christ did not actively support an anti slavery movement, this world
would not have progressed. If Paul had
confined himself because Jesus Christ did not preach to the gentiles, I would not have found a
friend in Jesus.
“Matt 7: 12 So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets.”
This verse is not about being safe on the conservative side.
It transcends race, religion, social standing, intellect, sexual orientation or any other
identity out there. There is no other law against love.
37-40 Jesus said, “‘Love the Lord your God with all your passion and prayer and intelligence.’ This is the most important, the first on any list. But there is a second to set alongside it: ‘Love others as well as you love yourself.’ These two commands are pegs; everything in God’s Law and the Prophets hangs from them.”
Sunday, January 06, 2013
Prajwala co founded by Sunitha Krishnan, a gang rape survivor - Rescued 3000+ and houses 600 sex trafficked victims
We all know about the brutal rape that happened in Delhi. Six
men raped a 23 year old in a moving bus, beat her up, inserted an iron rod in
her vagina, tortured her and left her naked on the streets. Her male friend was
also savagely beaten up. She lost 3 litres of blood, had to undergo an
intestine transplant since her's were severely damaged but despite
medical intervention succumbed to her injuries and died. This has
shaken up the conscience of the general public.
What happened to her was heinous. She held a mirror to the
nation. Her justice is not in how those rapists would be punished. It's about
how such crimes against women could be subverted. Please listen to this TED
talk by Dr. Sunitha Krishnan
For those who want to do something about sexual crimes against
women - you could donate to Prajwala - co founded by Sunitha Krishnan who was
raped by 8 men when she was 15 and has been fighting relentlessly against human
trafficking for the past 16 years despite getting beaten up by goons more than
15 times. She has rescued 3000+ victims and her rehabilitation centre homes 600
sex trafficked victims.
It would make a huge difference if we pledge to donate a small
amount every month or make a one time donation to support the work of
people like Sunitha Krishnan who have put their lives on the line for this
cause. 1000 INR per month or 100 INR pe rmonth won't make a dent in our
household income but it could help save lives.
Accolades:
- Prajwala is a member of various national and state level committees to combat trafficking. For its efforts in the sector the organization has been recognized by various national and international bodies like Government of India, World of Children, UNFPA and Ashoka Innovators.
- Anamika - The Nameless a film produced by Prajwala won two international awards in De Cine De Granada and Action Cut International Film Festival.
- Of Freedom and Fear a film produced in collaboration with Andhra Pradesh AIDS Control Society was screened in the New York Film Festival, Mini DV International Festival.
- Dr Sunitha Krishnan the founder general secretary and the chief functionary of Prajwala has been recognised for her efforts in the anti trafficking sector by the following national and international bodies
- Prajwala won the prestigious AGFUND International award in April, 2008 for its pioneering work to Combat Trafficking of Women and Children through Community Partnership. Prajwala was adjudged the best project in the world for its outstanding efforts.
- Dr Sunitha Krishnan the chief functionary and co-founder of Prajwala won the ‘Real Heroes Award’ constituted by Reliance Industries Limited and CNN-IBN Network in April, 2008. This award is meant to recognize the unsung heroes of independent India.
- Dr.Sunitha Krishnan, Chief Functionary of the organization was felicitated by Intelligence Business Network, Malaysia in March 2009. This felicitation has had a great positive impact as an entry point was created to sensitize women corporate leaders to be sensitive on the issue of trafficking.
- Prajwala received the National Award for Child Welfare from the Govt. of India in February, 09 for the exceptional services it renders to prevent child trafficking and its outstanding efforts to rescue and rehabilitate child victims of sex trafficking.
- Dr.Sunitha Krishnan has been featured as a Real Hero in the Trafficking in Persons Report, released by the US Department of State in June, 2009. This is an acknowledgment of activists fighting to end modern day slavery – Nine persons from across the world were chosen as 2009 TIP Heroes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Mugilan and Venmathi
They met when they were 10 and 11 Two magnets circling around - bumping in and drifting off Like and unlike poles - Pulsating ever on the ...
-
This is something that has been in my mind lately. More so because of how the fundamentalist and evangelical churches point at Homosexu...
-
There are times when we understand the gravity of a situation without letting emotions cloud our judgement. It helps maintain our objecti...
-
They met when they were 10 and 11 Two magnets circling around - bumping in and drifting off Like and unlike poles - Pulsating ever on the ...